Skip to main content

Background


On July 17, 2020 the Senate Judiciary Committee released a 59 page summary of the FBI interview with the Primary Sub Source for the Steele Dossier.  This interview took place in January 2017.  The FBI would continue to use this information from this source to renew the FISA application on Carter Page at least two more times.  Keep this in mind as I reveal the identity of this person.  They knew in January 2017 exactly who this person was and this person's qualifications for accusing the President of the United States of conspiring with a foreign power.  This dossier was also a key component of the Intelligence community's assessment that Russia interfered in the election.

Here is a link to the summary of the interview (with redactions).  Many of these redactions will be revealed in the next post.


The primary sub source was the person who gathered Intel for Christopher Steele and Orbis Intelligence on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

This is the person responsible for the material that led to a Special Counsel and 2 years of political chaos in the United States.  

Comments

  1. "The agent, Peter Strzok, had not participated in the interview of Mr. Steele’s source."
    -NYT July 17, 2020

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fixed. For some reason I thought someone had confirmed him to be at the meeting. Still he should have found this person long before. What kind of investigation misses a Russian national feeding intelligence to a foreign spy and instead focuses on a Naval Academy grad like Carter Page? (A fake investigation would though).

      Delete
  2. Does this individual have a Ham Radio Licence?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't see one. There are several Brookings institute members who have one though. I did some poking around a long time ago and distinctly remember that. Unfortunately did not save the screenshots.

      Delete
    2. Nellie Orr has a ham radio🤔

      Delete
    3. Nellie Orr ham radio license

      https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/LicArchive/license.jsp?archive=Y&licKey=12382876

      Delete
  3. Strzok's lawyer denied that Pete was at the interview of PSS in his statement following the release of this material

    ReplyDelete
  4. Searched a Russian website called v-s.mobi for Danchenko and found this Voice of America Russia 12+ minute interview with him (in Russian) dated 2016-04-06 (assuming that's June 4, 2016, not Americanized April 6th).

    Title in Russian says "Analyst, Russia and Eurasia Igor Danchenko / Nagorno-Karabakh"

    Aналитик, Россия и Евразия Игорь Данченко/ Нагорный Карабах

    https://v-s.mobi/aналитик-россия-и-евразия-игорь-данченко-нагорный-карабах-12:47

    I'm banned on Twitter, so posting it for you here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm wrong. It would be April 6, 2016 that the interview was posted on that site. Year/Month/Day

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nellie Orr had a ham radio🤔

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmistakable Proof

Finally I found the proof.  The full resume that shows this person is almost without a doubt the primary sub source for the Steele dossier.  Bonus:  He worked with Fiona Hill!

Here is the full resume:
It matches every detail in the summary to a degree that it is almost certain that this is the primary sub source.





Here is a link to his senior thesis from University of Louisville.
So the primary sub source is Igor Danchenko

In London on October 11, 2016
Russia in August 2016


Trip to New York as Crossfire Hurricane opens

June 3, 2016 off to Moscow and London
Resume change on June 11, 2016


Dig at Carter Page?

Beach friends?


I'm willing to bet Orbis has some payments to Sidar Global Analysis that eventually wind up with Igor.
(It turns out I'm probably wrong about that one.  Target Labs, inc more likely)


More fun stuff.  Brookings Institute papers written with Fiona Hill and Erica Downs

Tracking the primary sub-source

Collaborative open source reporting is incredible.  If you find the right people online they will tell you a story hours, days, weeks, or even years before the mainstream media will deliver it to you.  By the time it does get to you it has been filtered and spun to suit whatever agenda and narrative they are pursuing at the time.  This is the story of how the primary sub source was uncovered with no traditional journalist being involved. It starts shortly after the summary is released.  The primary work is done on twitter.  Semi-Casual Observer (@CasualSemi)   posts a critical bit of information.  Based on the length of the redaction we know that the name is 14 characters long.  This starts the ball rolling.  


Using the length of the redactions we can then deduce many other details about the PSS (primary sub source's) biography.  There are redactions for a lot of different details like place of birth and where he went to school.  We know already it is a he by the way as the summary d…